Site icon Hot Pepper Communications

Logical fallacies: slippery slope

There are many logical fallacies, and over the next few weeks and months, I will occasionally focus on a fallacy. While fallacies are typically from the debating sphere and may seem out of place on a blog dedicated to writing, they do appear in writing as well. And not just in social media and blog comments either. They can appear in website and marketing copy, political speeches, opinion pieces, and so on.

Today’s fallacy is slippery slope.

What is the slippery slope fallacy?

When it comes to fallacies, a slippery slope is when a speaker, rather than countering or addressing the argument made by the other speaker, introduces extreme hypotheticals to the discussion. This tactic is often used when the speaker can’t address the argument raised by the opponent, so they try to deflect or distract, similar to the red herring and ad hominem fallacies.

Examples of the slippery slope fallacy

Here are some other examples of the slippery slope fallacy:

In all the above examples, the speaker offers no proof that their hypotheticals will actually occur, let alone as a direct result of the situation they oppose. They leverage fear to appeal to the emotions of the audience, which in itself is another fallacy.

Avoiding the points someone else raises by responding to baseless hypotheticals is unfair to them, and it’s intellectually lazy for you. Hopefully, these examples explain the importance of focusing on an opponent’s actual claims.

Which logical fallacy should I cover next? Let me know in the comments below.

Exit mobile version